Emerging clues to selectivity at the subunit level, especially in

Emerging clues to selectivity at the subunit level, especially in the context of nicotine dependence, concern the α5 subunit. Figure 1 shows that this subunit never participates at the agonist binding interface between α and β subunit but occupies a fifth or “auxiliary” position. In rodent brain, most α5∗ nAChRs are thought to be (α4)2(β2)2α5 pentamers (Gotti et al., 2006 and Albuquerque et al., 2009). In all known animals, the α5, α3, β4 genes form a cluster. Indeed, (α3)2(β4)2α5 pentamers are widespread in the peripheral nervous system, in the medial habenula, and in some nonneuronal cell

types. NU7441 mw [We do not emphasize (α3)2(β4)2α5 nAChRs or α3β4 nAChRs, because such nAChRs have relatively low nicotine sensitivity and relatively low susceptibility to upregulation.] Single-nucleotide polymorphisms found in the human α5, α3, β4 gene cluster are associated with nicotine dependence and

its age-dependent onset; number of cigarettes smoked mTOR inhibitor per day and “pleasurable buzz” elicited by smoking; alcoholism, sensitivity to the depressant effects of alcohol, and age of alcohol initiation; cocaine dependence; opioid dependence; lung cancer; and cognitive flexibility (Erlich et al., 2010, Hansen et al., 2010, Improgo et al., 2010, Saccone et al., 2010 and Zhang et al., 2010). A major “risk allele” is in a noncoding region of α5 and is associated with decreased expression of α5 subunit mRNA (Wang et al., 2009). A second “risk allele” occurs in the coding region, within the M3-M4 loop, and also produces decreased function of (α4)2(β2)2α5 nAChRs (Wang et al., 2009 and Kuryatov

et al., 2011). Furthermore in experiments using chronic nicotine exposure in rats, (α4)2(β2)2α5 nAChRs are not upregulated, but (presumptive) (α4)2(β2)3 nAChRs in the same brain region are (Mao et al., 2008). Summarizing the available data, the “risk alleles” may decrease the fraction of (α4)2(β2)2α5, increasing that of α4β2 nAChRs. Because α4β2 nAChRs are the most susceptible to nicotine-induced upregulation, the data again seem consistent with the idea that selective upregulation of α4β2 nAChRs underlies whatever nicotine dependence. The potential power of α4β2 upregulation to explain the initial events of nicotine dependence thus derives from its selectivity, displayed at every level of organization: regional, neuronal, cellular, and stoichiometric. Selective upregulation would directly result in modified neuronal excitability and neuronal interactions. As noted above, in the context of nicotine dependence, selective upregulation presently has been studied in detail only in midbrain and in the perforant path. Thus it remains an audacious hypothesis that the initial stages of nicotine dependence can be explained solely by “selective upregulation,” with no additional mechanisms of regulation, adaptation, neuroadaptation, homeostasis, or plasticity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>