, 1995), demonstrated that Selleck SCH-900776 NRP1-positive axons emerged from the RGC layer (Figure S1 available online). We conclude that NRP1, but not NRP2, is expressed in the developing mouse visual system at the correct time and in the right place to play a role in RGC axon growth. To determine if NRP1 is essential for RGC pathfinding at the optic chiasm, we studied

mice carrying a Nrp1 null mutation on a mixed CD1/JF1 genetic background, which ameliorates the severe cardiovascular defects seen in mutants on the C57 BL/6J background and enables embryo survival until E14.5 ( Schwarz et al., 2004). We performed anterograde DiI labeling of RGC axons from one eye at E14.0, when axons have just entered the optic tracts, and at E14.5, when both contralateral and ipsilateral tracts are established ( Figure S2A). Wholemount views of the chiasm revealed striking and consistent differences in RGC organization between homozygous mutants and their wild-type littermates ( Figures 2A and 2B; n = 10 each). First, all mutants showed defasciculation of both the ipsilateral and contralateral optic tracts, with axons being organized into two discrete bundles. Consequently, the normal asymmetry in the width of the contralateral and ipsilateral tracts was lost

in the mutants. Second, the proportion Dolutegravir mouse of axons projecting ipsilaterally appeared increased in the mutants. Sections through the DiI-labeled brains showed that the optic tracts were thinner in mutants than in wild-types, due to their defasciculation (Figure 2C). However, the path taken by the mutant axons appeared normal, both at the level of the optic chiasm (Figure 2C, top panels) and at the site where the optic tracts began to diverge (Figure 2C, bottom panels). Thus, axons did not stray from the pial surface or project aberrantly at the midline, as seen in mutants lacking SLITs (Plump et al., 2002). Gross disturbances in axon guidance at the midline are therefore not the likely cause of the increased ipsilateral projection in Nrp1 null

mutants. Owing to the lethality of Nrp1 null mutants at E15.5, we could not quantify the number and distribution of ipsilaterally projecting RGCs by conventional retrograde DiI labeling from the optic tract to until the retina; this method only works reliably from E15.5 onward, when many axons have reached the dorsal thalamus ( Godement et al., 1987 and Manuel et al., 2008). We therefore analyzed Nrp1 null mice at E14.5, the latest time point at which mutants were perfectly viable, using a semiquantitative method that measures the relative fluorescence in the ipsilateral optic tract and compares it to the sum of fluorescence intensity in both optic tracts ( Figure 2D; adapted from Herrera et al., 2003). This so-called ipsilateral index was increased 5-fold in mutants compared to wild-type littermates (wild-types: 0.08 ± 0.02; mutants: 0.38 ± 0.06; n = 10 each; p < 0.001; Figure 2D).