In the experiments of dilution, DI water was added stepwise to pa

In the experiments of dilution, DI water was added stepwise to particles/polymers salted dispersion with 3 M NH4Cl and the hydrodynamic diameter were determined by light scattering. Figure 4 shows the D H versus I S during the dilution process. For the dispersion prepared at isoelectric point (Z = 1), an abrupt transition was observed at a critical ionic strength = 0.38 ± 0.01 M, 0.54 ± 0.01 M, and 2.3 ± 0.01 M for PTEA11K-b-PAM30K, PDADMAC, and PEI, respectively. This transition illustrates two different colloidal states of the dispersion during the dilution process: above , the particles and polymers remain independent and unaggregated; below , the anionic particles are retained within dense and spherical

clusters, thanks to the cationic polymer ‘glue’. Dispersions prepared apart from the isoelectric point, i.e., at Z = 0.3 and Z = 7 were found to undergo similar desalting transitions. The critical ionic strengths corresponding www.selleckchem.com/products/ch5424802.html to the different polymer and different particles-polymers charges ratio Z were shown in Table 3. As a comparison, Figure 5 displays ionic strength dependence of the hydrodynamic diameter D H for a dispersion containing only the individual components,

which is PAA2K-coated γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles, Acalabrutinib supplier PTEA11K-b-PAM30K, PDADMAC, PEI, and PAH. These individual components are all stable up to an I S of 3 M, and no transition could be evidenced. Figure 4 D H versus I S during the dilution process. Ionic strength dependence of the hydrodynamic diameter D H for a dispersion containing γ-Fe2O3-PAA2K particles and oppositely charged PTEA11K-b-PAM30K (black closed symbols), PDADMAC (red closed symbols), and PEI (blue closed symbols) at Z = 0.3, Z = 1, and Z = 7. At Z = 1, with decreasing I S , an abrupt transition was observed at a critical ionic strength at 0.38 ± 0.01 M, 0.54 ± 0.01 M, and 2.3 ± 0.01 M for the solution containing PTEA11K-b-PAM30K, PDADMAC, and PEI, respectively. At Z = 0.3 and Z = 7, their critical ionic strength was found to be 0.40 ± 0.01

M, 0.54 ± 0.01 M, 2.5 ± 0.01 M, 0.49 ± 0.01 M, and 2.1 ± 0.01 M respectively. At Z = 1, because of their maximum SPTBN5 complexation, the size of clusters based on PDADMAC and PEI are superior to 1 μm at the end of dilution, which induced a macroscopic phase separation (marked by the empty symbols and patterned area). Table 3 Critical ionic strength  obtained at the different particles-polymers charges ration Z Polymer at Z = 0.3 (M) at Z = 1.0 (M) at Z = 7 (M) PTEA11K-b-PAM30K 0.40 ± 0.01 0.38 ± 0.01 – PDADMAC 0.54 ± 0.01 0.54 ± 0.01 0.49 ± 0.01 PEI 2.5 ± 0.01 2.3 ± 0.01 2.1 ± 0.01 Figure 5 Ionic strength dependence of the hydrodynamic diameter D H for a dispersion containing the individual components. Which is PAA2K-coated γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles (closed symbols), PTEA11K-b-PAM30K (black open circles), PDADMAC (red open squares), PEI (blue open squares), and PAH (green open squares).

Comments are closed.