longicornisKB five calculation runs were done for 5, 10, 12.5, 15 and 20°C at different food levels. The impact find more of temperature on growth rates was defined by the function

fte, which at lower temperatures (< 15°C) is described by Q10 and at higher ones by the parabolic threshold function ft2. The growth rate of T. longicornisKB increases rapidly with rising temperature in the 5–15°C range but less so with a food concentration from 25 mgC m−3 to excess. But the growth rates for the model stages were nearly equal at both 15°C and of 20°C according to the function fte. Figure 5 shows that the optimum temperature for the development of T. longicornis is slightly higher than 15°C. In the real environment during summer, in the 15–20°C temperature range, and probably with limited food availability, an increase in temperature reduces growth of almost all developmental stages. The growth rate of T. longicornisH at 12.5°C in the 25–200 mgC m−3 range of food concentration was also obtained here after data given by Harris and Paffenhöfer, 1976a and Harris and Paffenhöfer, 1976b. If we compare our results of g for T. longicornisKB at 12.5°C to the same stage groups as in their studies and assume that N1 does not grow, it appears that those authors www.selleckchem.com/products/GDC-0449.html probably found values similar to (Temora) or higher than (Pseudocalanus) those found by Klein Breteler et al. (1982) at the same food concentration

and temperature (see pp. 205–206 in Klein Breteler et al. 1982). The values of g for T. longicornisH except the naupliar stages are higher than those for T. longicornisKB at 12.5°C, which were computed using the equation given by Hirst et al. (2005) and according to the Q10 coefficient. On the basis of the findings and analysis in this study, differences in g are found between the two species and are smaller if the correction by Hirst et al. (2005) is included. The growth rate of T. longicornisH is from 1.15

to 2.4 times higher than g for T. longicornisKB and depends on development stage and food concentration; for example, for early copepodids assuming Dapagliflozin Food = 200 mgC m−3, g is equal to 0.43 day−1 and 0.374 day−1, and for Food = 25 mgC m−3, g is equal to 0.24 day−1 and 0.121 day−1 respectively. It is more probable that the difference between the results found by these authors is explained by the different algae used as food and other conditions of the experiments. The quality and quantity of food available to copepods is very important for their growth and development. In natural conditions copepod diets are selective and diverse. Selectivity by copepods may relate to the size of the prey (Atkinson 1995), its toxicity (Huntley et al. 1986) and nutritional quality (Houde & Roman 1987). Copepods often consume not just phytoplankton but heterotrophic flagellates and ciliates, detritus and other metazoans, and they can feed cannibalistically (Hirst & Bunker 2003).