The RHS and LHS groups did not differ on the IMD. The IMD was negatively correlated with all neuropsychological test scores in the LHS group. In the RHS group, the IMD was not significantly correlated with any of the neuropsychological measures. There were no significant correlations in the RHS group. Regression analyses suggested that IMD score explained 3% of variance in the measures of intellect,

but 8% of the variance in verbal learning in the LHS group. The IMD explained 1% or less of the variance in neuropsychological scores in the RHS group. Controlling for overall level of intellectual function, the IMD score explained a small but significant Selleckchem BYL719 proportion of the variance in verbal learning in the LHS group and visual learning for the RHS group.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients living in an area with a high IMD enter surgery with greater focal deficits associated https://www.selleckchem.com/products/BIBF1120.html with their epilepsy and more widespread cognitive deficits if they have LHS. Further work is needed to establish the direction of the relationship between low socioeconomic status and the neurocognitive

sequelae of epilepsy. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.”
“In the spin-valve Co(4 angstrom)/Pt(36 angstrom)/[Co(4 angstrom)/Pt(6 angstrom)](n) multilayers with perpendicular anisotropy, an oscillatory variation of the anomalous Hall resistivity and longitudinal resistivity has been observed with the increase in the repetition number n, and it is almost temperature-independent. The anomalous Hall resistivity is fitted by a new scaling which includes the residual resistivity, i.e., rho(AH) – a’rho(xx0) + b rho(2)(xx). a’ changes MI-503 inhibitor nonmonotonically with the repetition number n, while b oscillates as a function of n. These observed

oscillatory behaviors of rho(xx), b, and rho(AH) can be mainly attributed to the Co/Pt interface scattering. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3622518]“
“Background: Patient device acceptance might be essential in identifying patients at risk for adverse patient-reported outcomes following implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). We examined the validity and reliability of the Florida Patient Acceptance Scale (FPAS) and identified correlates of device acceptance in a Dutch cohort of ICD patients.

Methods: Patients with a first-time ICD (N = 272, mean age = 59.2 +/- 11.9, 82% men) recruited from the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, or the Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands completed the FPAS, the Type D Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that eliminating three items from the FPAS, leaving 12 items contributing to three factors, is equivalent to the original four-factor version of the FPAS. The abbreviated FPAS had a high internal consistency both for the total scale and all subscales, with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from 0.76 to 0.82. Anxiety (odds ratio [OR]: 9.