Two of the most frequent sources of malaria education reported during buy GSK J4 this investigation were “word of mouth” and “casual conversation.” These methods can be beneficial if a trusted person was passing along correct information, but detrimental if the information or advice from a trusted person was incorrect. In order to ensure crew members receive correct and consistent information, education should be provided in an appropriate learning environment,

which may be different between pilots and FA. Additionally, there should be ample opportunities to ask questions from a knowledgeable health care professional. Both occupational groups reported a strong preference to hear about the experiences of fellow crew members who were recently ill with malaria. This practice should be pursued with a crew member trained to serve in this role and assist in raising crew members’ awareness of their occupational risk for malaria. Training can be re-emphasized with educational material in airport lounges, such as posters and the FAQ sheets. As scheduling work trips can occur months in advance, sending text and e-mail messages 2 to 3 days prior to travel to a malaria-intense destination would remind crew members to prepare their preventive measures before departure. This investigation was subject to at least five limitations. The low participation

rate, which was ICG-001 price not unexpected for

an Internet survey, makes generalizability to all crew members difficult. Selection bias was introduced as FA whose travel included West Africa in the previous year were actively solicited by a company e-mail to participate in the Palmatine survey. Their responses may be different from other FA eligible for international travel. Also, selection bias by the participants may have occurred, as those who completed the survey may have been different from nonparticipants. The assessment of malaria knowledge may have been biased if participants sought assistance while completing the questions. Finally, reporting bias could be present, as participants may under or over report the frequencies of their practices knowing that their employer would receive the cumulative information, participants were free to skip questions, and without personal identification information or IP addresses, there was no control to avoid duplicate questionnaire submissions from the same participant. Despite a sound basic knowledge of malaria transmission and preventive measures, both the FA and pilot populations had a low perception of their occupational risks for malaria. Many participants practiced risky, but some unavoidable, activities that may have increased their malaria exposure and rarely used all the recommended preventive measures during layovers at malaria-intense destinations.