Using confirmatory factor analyses, they deter mined that, there was an “adequate fit” solely for a fourfactor model. A recent meta-analysis examined the data from 21 studies involving 5124 participants and confirmed the validity of the same four factors.21 Studies were examined if they involved subjects with OCD and included an exploratory factor analysis of the 13 YBOCS-SC categories and the items therein.14 Stratified meta-analysis Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical was conducted to determine the factor structure of OCD in studies involving children and adults separately. The four factors generated were: (Factor I) Forbidden thoughts – aggression, sexual, religious, and somatic obsessions

and checking compulsions; (Factor II) Symmetry – symmetry obsessions and repeating, ordering, and counting compulsions; (Factor III) Cleaning – cleaning and contamination; and (Factor IV) Hoarding – hoarding obsessions and compulsions. Factor analysis of studies including adults yielded an identical factor structure compared with the overall meta-analysis. The only differences Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical between the factor structures involving adults and children were: (i) checking compulsions loaded highest on the Forbidden thoughts factor in adults and with the Symmetry factor in children; and (ii) somatic obsessions loaded highest Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical on the Forbidden

thoughts factor in adults and with the Cleaning factor in children. The shifting of checking symptoms from one factor to another is likely attributable to the inherent ambiguity of checking symptoms in the Y-BOCS-SC. This ambiguity in the checking category of the Y-BOCSSC has been addressed in the newly developed dimensional OCD scales such as the Dimensional Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (DY-BOCS), Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical which associates specific checking and avoidance OC Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical symptoms with each OC symptom dimension/ factor.22 Although the understanding of the dimensional structure of OC symptoms is still imperfect, this quantitative approach to phenotypic traits has the

potential to advance our understanding of OCD, and may aid in the identification of more robust endophenotypes. As reviewed below, preliminary data suggest that these dimensional phenotypes may be useful in our efforts to understand the natural history, genetics, Org 27569 neurobiology, treatment response, and outcomes of OCD.13,14 A developmental perspective Typically, developing children engage in a significant amount of ritualistic, repetitive, and compulsive-like activity. This phenomenon reaches a peak at about 24 months of age.23 Remarkably, the content of these behaviors closely resembles the OC symptom dimensions.24 .For example, parents reported that their children arranged Selleckchem Dinaciclib objects or performed certain behaviors until they seemed “just, right.” on average, beginning at 22 to 25 months of age (Factor II).